How to Present Illustrations as Evidence in the Best Way Possible
Using medical illustrations is a great way for prosecutors and defense counsel to present their case. But lawyers can’t just show up in court carrying a stack of pictures, graphs, and illustrations. Those materials are evidence that can help make an argument more convincing, and per the rules of court, the opposition needs to receive notification of such resources.
Before any lawyer can present stock medical illustrations to a jury, regardless of how general, they first need to send a letter to the opposing counsel. The letter should include important points that include the intention to use illustrations, where they are, as well as an invitation to review the materials at their convenience before the trial. It doesn’t matter if they don’t send a reply, just as long as there’s proof that someone in their office signed for the receipt.
After the defense counsel has been duly informed of the presence of illustrations in the case, the strategy of the case will determine when they can be used. Some experienced litigators like starting their opening statements with illustrations. This is because the pictures can pique the interest of the jury, as well as set the tone for the rest of the trial. There are also some lawyers who are of the opinion that illustrations best serve the interest of the case as part of a counter argument, as this makes the lawyer look like experts.
Even if the opposing counsel received the letter of notice, there’s a chance that they’ll still object to the use of the illustrations. Lawyers who use illustrations shouldn’t have anything to worry about, as long as the materials they’re using strictly adhere to the criteria of admissibility. The information presented should be relevant to the case, accurate, and in no way misleading.
There are several ways for lawyers to easily meet all the items of the criteria of admissibility. They can get verification from qualified experts in the field concerned; this should dispel any doubts regarding the authenticity of the information.
There’s nothing more legally hard-hitting than saying “As I was saying, before we were interrupted by the defendant’s lawyer’s groundless objection” in an actual trial.