<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU’s Spying Project: Operation CIA Paparazzi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chandlerswatch.com/2009/08/26/aclu%e2%80%99s-spying-project-operation-cia-paparazzi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chandlerswatch.com/2009/08/26/aclu%e2%80%99s-spying-project-operation-cia-paparazzi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:37:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jim coyle</title>
		<link>http://www.chandlerswatch.com/2009/08/26/aclu%e2%80%99s-spying-project-operation-cia-paparazzi/comment-page-1/#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>jim coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chandlerswatch.com/?p=8534#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>so to put this in context let us reference &quot;true lies&quot;(the movie) as opposed to liberalspeak, or is it progressivespeak now (I can&#039;t keep tract). it&#039;s against the law to play along with the car salesman&#039;s fantasy and expose him as a &quot;spy&quot;, but it is ok to out actual operatives thus further weakening our national security? thank god I am reading 1984 for the second time (1st time summer reading list 1966) perhaps it will suffice as a refresher course and help me catch up. I&#039;m not sure if big brother is becoming inevitable but it seems  we already have &quot;big bro&quot; let&#039;s keep them from having &quot;ther&quot; way (misspelling intended) Thank you Michelle for helping in the good fight love ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so to put this in context let us reference &#8220;true lies&#8221;(the movie) as opposed to liberalspeak, or is it progressivespeak now (I can&#8217;t keep tract). it&#8217;s against the law to play along with the car salesman&#8217;s fantasy and expose him as a &#8220;spy&#8221;, but it is ok to out actual operatives thus further weakening our national security? thank god I am reading 1984 for the second time (1st time summer reading list 1966) perhaps it will suffice as a refresher course and help me catch up. I&#8217;m not sure if big brother is becoming inevitable but it seems  we already have &#8220;big bro&#8221; let&#8217;s keep them from having &#8220;ther&#8221; way (misspelling intended) Thank you Michelle for helping in the good fight love ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
