Is this the beginning of the North American Union?
In an unprecedented, not publicized meeting on Feb. 14th, 2008 at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, the commanding generals of USNORTHCOM and Command Canada signed a “civil assistance plan” agreement. This agreement would authorize the use of U.S. and Canadian armed forces to support each other in a domestic civil emergency. The emergency does not have to be a cross border emergency either.

U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, commander of USNORTHCOM, signs agreement Feb. 14, 2008, with Canadian Air Force Lt. Gen. Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command (USNORTHCOM photo)
Update: It has come to this Marine’s attention that the only way a four-star General could have possibly negotiated a deal like this…is from obtaining permission from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who received permission from the Secretary of Defense, who received permission from the Vice President, who received permission from the President! A four-star General, especially the commander of USNORTHCOM, reports directly to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. There is a strict chain of command here, people!
Again, we are back to President Bush and his insisting on the creation of a North American Union without the approval of Congress and the American people. Dr. Jerome Corsi, of World Net Daily, had this to say about the agreement, “The agreement, defined as a Civil Assistance Plan, was not submitted to Congress for approval, nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms, to health epidemics, to civil riots or terrorist attacks.”
In this Marine’s opinion, this is just another cog in the machine that is going to be the North American Union. The Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is a plan by the Bush administration to facilitate an economic integration with Canada and Mexico. Most may not know this, but this is how the EU started. You may think me a “conspiracy theorist” but if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, stinks like a duck, odds are…you are staring at a duck. I can understand “supporting” our neighbor; it is the right thing to do. But to authorize one country’s military to conduct domestic control over another country’s people is beyond the pail. Canada should be strong enough to care for its’ own people without our help!
An agreement of this sort should pass through Congress, especially when it deals with the lives of our brave service members. Not to mention all of the brouhaha not more than five months ago about the SPP and inland safe zones that would be controlled by the Mexican Government, right here in Kansas City.
This reminds me of a little thing called NATO. When it first came to fruition I would bet dollars to doughnuts that Turkey was not expected to be a member nation; surprise Turkey is a member nation today. NATO was formed to protect Europe from the USSR, mother Russia, and now we have former nation states from the USSR as members. If you go back and look more deeply into SPP it is not hard to see the Mexican military signing onto this agreement, just like Turkey was admitted into NATO.
Can someone explain to me how this isn’t a violation of the Logan Act? Or how this agreement does not violate the sovereignty of the United States of America? Is this not the beginning of the North American Union? I hope you have stock piled your Ameros.
§ 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments.
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply himself, or his agent, to any foreign government, or the agents thereof, for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
1 Stat. 613, January 30, 1799, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 953 (2004).
Someone needs to also explain to this Marine under what “authority” this General used to sign such an agreement. They also need to explain how a General Officer from a foreign nation is not “an officer or agent thereof” of a government that is foreign. And if you cannot explain these points to me please explain why we, as a nation, should not Courts Martial or Try those that are involved in these dealings, either directly or indirectly. Since when has it been policy that a U.S. General dictates foreign policy?
(WND)